INTERNATIONALLY KNOWN MAKER OF HIGH-PRECISION TOOLS USES FEA TO SHORTEN DESIGN PHASE
Harold Lawson, Jr., Project Engineer
Moore Special Tool Co., Inc.
Bridgeport, Connecticut
 | Harold
Lawson, Jr., of Moore Special Tool Co., Inc. |
Moore Special Tool Co., Inc., of Bridgeport, Connecticut, is an
internationally-known manufacturer of high-precision Jig Grinders,
Aspheric Generators, Universal Coordinate Measuring Machines,
and Metrology products.
After Moore began using the CADKEY 3-D design and drafting software
for some of their engineering work, they looked for other computer-aided
engineering tools, most notably finite element analysis (FEA).
"While we were looking for FEA software, one of our major
concerns was how the FEA programs would interact with the CAD
software that we had already invested in," recalls Harold
Lawson of Moore. "We needed a system that would be CADKEY-compatible.
Not only did Algor's FEA System have, at the time we purchased
it, individual modules available that could convert our CADKEY
files, but their CAD program, Superdraw II, had Import and Export
commands incorporated into it that let us transfer CADKEY files
directly to and from their system. They also offer training courses
throughout the US. This was another definite plus, since it meant
that we could learn how to use the software quickly and begin
applying it to Moore's designs right away."
Equally important for Moore in their decision to use Algor's FEA
System was the fact that Algor's computer analysis is so much
faster than the physical testing that Moore had been using.
As Lawson explains, "Before we began using Algor's FEA, the
method of testing a design was to go through the whole process
of fabricating the part and trying it out - but that still didn't
tell us how manufacturing tolerances would affect it. That is,
I wouldn't know what would happen if I ran plus or minus 10 or
15 percent unless I were to go through the trouble of making parts
that were 10 to 15 percent off the actual specifications and test
them, too. Unfortunately, that requires the use of a lot of personnel
and manufacturing time." Application of FEA at Moore will
mean a substantial time savings in their prototype cycle by enabling
them to come much closer to the optimal design the first time
around.
"Since we have very close tolerances, prototype testing created
a real bottleneck in the design process. Whereas most manufacturers
are not worried about millionths of an inch, we are."
The Problem
One part that Lawson has analyzed with Algor is a classic shrink-fit
problem involving a plain, thin ring gear having an inner diameter
of approximately six inches, and measuring 13/16 inch high with
a cross-section of 0.180 inch. This gear is shrink-fitted 1/3
of the way down from the top of a thick, slightly cone-shaped
cylinder. The contact pressure between the inside of the gear
and the outside of the cylinder has to be high enough to maintain
a friction torque; but if the interference fit is too high, the
gear and cylinder will deform. Moreover, the higher the interference
fit, the more the cylinder ID will deform. Moor's design goal
was to minimize the deformation of the inside cylinder while still
producing the required torque transmission between the cylinder
and gear. Lawson also wanted to know the tolerances and how they
would affect the torque transmission capacity of the gear.
"We could have just looked up this shrink fit in the ASME
Handbook and used their rules. But there was a problem: in the
case when a thin ring gear is being shrink-fitted onto a thick,
hollow shaft, the Handbook doesn't provide a way to determine
the minimum amount of interference fit required; there really
isn't one," Lawson relates. He could have attempted to figure
it out using the torque and contact pressure of the two surfaces,
but this still left yet another question: how much would the inside
of the thick cylinder deform due to the pressure from the ring
gear? Says Lawson, "The answer to a question like this is
critical to us - is it 20 or 40 millionths of an inch?"
"Furthermore," he continues, "how much material
do I have to leave so that the toolmakers (who hand-fit and hand-assemble
these parts) can do an accurate job?" Moore uses CNC griders,
lathes and milling machines to manufacture their parts; but for
hand-fitted parts in general, a hand-lapping and hand-scraping
process is employed to remove material from two adjoining surfaces
to create a perfect match. The materials from which the gear and
cylinder will be fabricated are two types of steel: 4140 and 4150.
Both these substances withstand Moore's heat-treating very well.
FEA Analysis
The Algor FEA System was an indispensable tool that Lawson used
to help him design the shrink-fitted gear. He began by creating
the outline geometry of the model in Superdraw II which, he says,
"does everything you want it to do." Although it was
only necessary to model a "pie-section" of the gear/cylinder
interface due to its symmetry about the center axis and the uniformity
of the loading conditions, Lawson chose to model the full 360
degrees for documentation and display purposes. To create the
full model, Lawson had a choice of generating the mesh using either
Superdraw II or Algor's mesh generators. He chose the latter method,
linking the outline of the model through MSHGEN and into RADGENBR,
which automatically generated 64 "pie-sections" of four
elements each, creating a total of 256 brick elements.
With AEdit, Algor's preprocessing editor, Lawson set boundary
conditions on the model and applied loads. He constrained several
nodes in the direction of the Z-axis to hold the gear fixed in
space. "You have to hold at least one node totally fixed,
or two of the nodes translationally fixed," he explains.
"Otherwise, the model is free to move around anywhere in
space. Then, when you apply the loads, they won't affect the geometry
of the model - they'll just be pushing it around in space."
A uniform internal pressure of 281 psi was also applied to each
of the element faces on the inner diameter of the gear with AEdit.
"Calculating the resulting displacements from the applied
loads was easy, using Algor's processor," comments Lawson.
"All I had to do was enter the file name and specify which
options I wanted the processor to use. Their program did the rest,
using the model that I had specified." The results of Algor's
analysis indicated that a radial displacement of approximately
0.0008 inch had occurred. Knowing this, Lawson could then work
backwards. When the displacement of 0.0008 inch is reached, the
contact pressure required to hold the gear in place would be produced.
To verify the model, checking boundary conditions and ensuring
that displacements had occurred, Lawson used CPLOT. To view the
original and displaced models in 3-D after verification, he used
TDraw.
Lawson's analysis confirmed that Moore could use this gear on
the cylinder and that it would handle the 90 foot-pounds of torque
to which it would be subjected. "That torque will be transmitted
by the outside ring to the inner ring, and won't slip," he
points out. The Algor program also determined that the stresses,
according to the von Mises criterion, were 2500 psi - very low
for the type 4140 steel that would be used. It turned out that
the interference fit was 0.0015 inch. Lawson says, "I spoke
with the designer, who said the 0.0015 inch interference fit was
within safety and manufacturing factors - and, in fact, was quite
good. This means that we could relax manufacturing tolerances
from those that had originally been anticipated, so they wouldn't
be ridiculously high."
 | FEA
was used to analyze the fit between the gear and cylinder pictured. |
Future of FEA at Moore
"In the future, when we have more expertise in using Algor's
FEA System, we plan to use larger models created with CADKEY and
then converted into Algor's format through SuperDraw II's Files:Import
command," Lawson relates. "In particular, I would like
to use Algor to analyze displacements from castings, some of which
are simply due to gravity. We would like to predict the bowing
due to gravity or nonuniform loading of rolling members on the
castings under consideration."
According to Lawson, another area where Moore plans to apply FEA
is their 3-point support method for the Jig Grinders, Aspheric
Generators, and Universal Coordinate Measuring Machines. "Three
points of support are sufficient to prevent rocking," he
notes. "However if the support points do not form an equilateral
triangle and the loads are not evenly distributed, determining
the best configuration can be tricky. We'd like to use Algor's
FEA to help us with these support problems."
Lawson concludes, "After using Algor on the ring gear and
finding out not only how much it shortened the design phase, but
also how much more information it could provide for us, we intend
to use FEA as a tool whenever possible."
Copyright © 1989 Algor, Inc. All rights reserved.
|