ALGOR FEA USED IN DESIGN OF NEW BIOMASS PRODUCTION SYSTEM TO ENSURE
LAUNCH OF SPACE AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENTS
 |
The Biomass Production System (BPS) was designed by Orbital Technologies
Corporation (ORBITEC) for use on the Space Shuttle Middeck and the International Space
Station. Phase I and II efforts were funded by the NASA Kennedy Space Center and the Phase
III work is currently funded by NASA Ames Research Center. ORBITEC engineers used FEA
software from Pittsburgh-based ALGOR, Inc. to ensure the design would meet NASA
requirements for gravitational loading and maximum weight. |
Science fiction novelists have been writing about inhabiting space since before space
travel was even possible. Now, orbiting laboratories such as the International Space
Station (ISS) can provide unique environments for developing new medicines, industrial
materials and communications technology and may serve as stepping stones for more
ambitious colonization projects, which will require humans to be self-sustaining on
distant planets. One of the foremost skills colonists will need is the ability to grow
their own food. NASA is currently investing in research technology for on-orbit plant
growth that could eventually facilitate longer missions on the ISS or even permanent space
inhabitancy.
Orbital Technologies Corporation (ORBITEC), a Madison, Wisconsin research and
development firm, is providing NASA with the advanced tools needed to grow plants in space
and the FEA know-how to make sure these tools can be safely transported. Astronauts will
use the companys new Biomass Production System (BPS) to conduct biotechnology plant
research and metabolic experiments on photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration on the
middeck of the NASA Space Shuttle and rack facilities on the ISS as well.
In order to qualify the BPS for spaceflight, ORBITEC used linear static and dynamic
stress analysis software from Pittsburgh-based ALGOR, Inc. to prove that the unit could
withstand extreme dynamic loading during liftoff and landing. ORBITEC had to meet
NASAs stringent safety and engineering requirements and optimize the design without
resorting to costly, time-intensive prototyping.
|
 |
Scientists will use the BPS to conduct biotechnology plant research and metabolic
experiments on photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration on shuttle and ISS missions.
The BPS can contain up to four removable chambers, like the one shown here, which can be
accessed to capture the results of microgravity studies by freezing the plants on-orbit. |
The Next Generation in Orbital Plant Growth Research
"ORBITEC studied plant growth systems flown on previous Space Shuttle missions and
consulted with NASA engineers and the science community to develop the BPS," explains
Jeffery Iverson, a lead design engineer on the BPS project. "Our goal was to create a
unit that services current research needs as well as enables future technology upgrades.
The new BPS is the result of a large team of talented engineers, scientists and
technicians at both ORBITEC and NASA."
ORBITECs design features a double-locker enclosure, which more effectively
optimizes the available volume over previous payloads. The double-locker design is twice
the height of a single locker, enabling scientists to conduct more extensive and flexible
experimentation with the possibility of one large, two tall, two wide or four small
chambers. The new units enclosure slides open so that the astronauts have access to
the inner chambers through all phases of operation. By allowing astronauts to access the
plants, they can capture the results of microgravity studies by freezing the plants
on-orbit. This is an improvement over previous plant growth systems, which are closed for
the length of the mission and can taint the findings of the experiment by exposing the
plants to normal gravity conditions once the shuttle lands.
The box-shaped BPS features independent controls of temperature, humidity, lighting and
carbon dioxide levels; an active nutrient delivery system; and sealed chambers for gas
exchange measurements. In addition, the unit includes an advanced control system including
diagnostics and event recording, a high-resolution color front panel display and real-time
video output.
ORBITECs project to design and build the BPS began with Phase I and Phase II
contracts from NASA Kennedy Space Center through the Small Business Innovation Research
Program, a program created by the U.S. Congress to help small businesses more actively
participate in federal research and development. Today, the project is funded as a Phase
III contract through NASA Ames Research Center. According to Iverson, the company relied
heavily on FEA to meet the design requirements.
"The use of ALGOR FEA software was important because physical prototyping was not
an option with the limited time and resources available," says Iverson. "The
NASA requirements for high strength in combination with our needs for low weight, maximum
volume and a short design time forced us to turn to FEA."
Iversons FEA studies focused on four fully constrained attachment points at the
corners of the BPS because these areas would experience the greatest loads during liftoff
and landing. The location of the proposed BPS in the shuttle was a major design concern,
according to Iverson. "The BPS will be bolted directly to an internal shuttle wall
above the astronauts during liftoff making the structural analysis a critical safety
requirement," explains Iverson.
Iverson was also concerned about four latches on the front panel that secure the
sliding portion of the enclosure. These four points bear the weight of the unit when the
enclosure is latched shut.
With these considerations in mind, Iverson modeled and analyzed the BPS enclosure using
ALGORs linear static and dynamic stress analysis software to ensure no failure at
the attachment points or front panel latches.
|
 |
Jeffery Iverson, a lead design engineer on the BPS project, used AutoCAD 13 to
design a solid model of the BPS enclosure. He converted the model to surfaces and then
transferred the surface data as an IGES file to ALGOR. |
|
| Engineering for NASA Iverson began the BPS enclosure design by
building a solid model using AutoCAD 13. Then he converted the model into more than 200
surfaces so that the edges of the surfaces would align at planned interaction points with
beam elements, which were to be added to the FEA model in ALGOR.
Iverson transferred the model in IGES format to Superdraw III, ALGORs single user
interface for FEA and precision finite element model-building tool, where he created a
surface mesh using both automatic and localized hand-meshing techniques. Iverson used
Supersurf to generate a surface mesh made of 3-D plate elements. "The geometry
consisted of many very thin sections. I chose to use plates instead of 3-D solid bricks or
tetrahedra to limit the number of elements in the model," says Iverson.
"ALGORs ability to mesh multiple surfaces saved a lot of modeling time. This
was a huge benefit given the short timeframe."
Iverson first produced a coarse surface mesh and ran preliminary analyses to verify the
geometry. Then he produced a finer overall mesh and refined the surface mesh around the
attachment points and front panel latches using ALGORs Merlin Meshing Technology
(MMT). MMT features an "open plate" model option that enables engineers to
create a more consistent mesh, improve the shape of elements and reduce the overall mesh
density for plate/shell models. Iverson also used an automatic surface mesh matching
option to align nodes where surfaces meet. |
Midplane
Meshing
Algor's midplane meshing option automatically converts thin, solid
features into plate/shell elements. This option makes it easier for engineers to take
advantage of the processing speed associated with plate/shell elements. The engineer
simply specifies a thickness. Any plate-like regions of the model or assembly thinner than
that thickness are then converted to plate/shell elements. The generated plate/shell
elements are assigned an appropriate thickness and are automatically placed at the
midplane of the solid regions they replace. |
| Editor's Note: Algor now offers a mid-plane meshing
option in Superdraw III, which could have been used to speed up the run times of
thin-walled models comprised of a combination of solid and plate/shell elements.
Please see the sidebar for details. |
|
|
Iverson used ALGORs Merlin Meshing Technology (MMT) to create a finer mesh
around latches on the front panel that secure the sliding portion of the enclosure. MMT
features an "open plate" model option that enables engineers to create a more
consistent mesh, improve the shape of elements and reduce the overall mesh density for
plate/shell models. |
Once he had completed the plate model, Iverson copied the geometry into a new file and
selected lines and nodes that represent the ribs and structural elements of the internal
payload. "The sides of the enclosure contain very thin, raised ribs machined directly
into the side of the enclosure," Iverson explains. "These ribs provide important
structural rigidity to the enclosure. I modeled them separately as beam elements to ensure
an accurate representation of the structure without significantly increasing analysis run
times."
Iverson deleted the remaining deselected elements and used ALGORs Beam Design
Editor to specify the beam cross-sectional properties, which were derived from Roarks
Formulas for Stress and Strain. He identified different groups in Superdraw III for
the beam properties than for the plates in the first model to enable easy modification of
element properties in the merged plate/beam model.
Using the MIL Spec Handbook 5G, the materials handbook required by NASA, Iverson
specified 7075 aircraft aluminum for the outside enclosure and 15-5 PH stainless steel for
the latches. The weight of the payload and enclosure, approximately 125 lbs., as well as
varying launch and landing gravitational loadings were applied in 20 different load cases
to the combined plate/beam model. According to Iverson, NASA specified the varying
combination and distribution of gravitational vectors. Iverson conducted approximately 90
iterations of linear static stress analysis to optimize the design.
|
 |
Iverson combined beam and plate elements into the FEA model to simulate the
structural rigidity of the enclosure. The beam elements represent very thin aluminum ribs
on the sides of the enclosure and the structural elements of the internal payload. Here,
the ALGOR linear static stress analysis results for the beam structure and plate enclosure
are shown separately. |
"As both designer and analyst, I was in the unique position to look for ways to
add conservancy to the model while staying within the specifications of the design,"
says Iverson, who did this by adjusting the beam cross-sectional properties and
redistributing internal load bearing points. "Situations with separate designers and
analysts can lack the communication needed to make quick adjustments to the product
according to analysis findings."
The Next Step
The resulting design met NASAs requirements for maximum gravitational loading and
margin of safety. Using ALGORs built-in visualization capabilities, Iverson viewed
the stress results using von Mises output for the plate elements and the standard
Beam-Truss output for the beam elements. Iverson used the maximum stress results found in
the ALGOR stress analysis to determine the calculated limit stress value, which was
factored into margins of safety calculations for ultimate strength and yield strength.
"NASA looks for positive margins of safety," says Iverson. "A margin of
safety of zero means that the calculated stress is on the edge of what is acceptable, but
still includes the required factor of safety." The minimum margin of safety for the
BPS was 0.6.
Iverson further tested the design by conducting a brief linear natural frequency stress
(modal) analysis to ensure that the natural frequencies of the enclosure would not
interfere with the frequencies of the shuttle wall. Iverson noted small deflections in the
course of the modal analysis; however, the BPS design met the lowest fundamental frequency
requirements for its proposed location in the shuttle, according to Iverson.
"The loading placed on the BPS is equivalent to
10-15gs. Loads of this magnitude would be virtually impossible to simulate. In
addition, the structure will never be loaded to that level in practice," says
Iverson. "The benefit of using FEA is to evaluate theoretical loads on an object
without physical prototyping." The BPS has successfully undergone verification
vibration testing with lesser gravitational loads, adds Iverson, which was used to verify
the natural frequency analysis results.
|
 |
Iverson conducted approximately 90 analysis iterations, adjusting the beam
cross-sectional properties and redistributing internal load bearing points, to optimize
the design. The resulting design met NASAs requirements for maximum gravitational
loading and margin of safety. Iverson used the maximum stress results found in the ALGOR
stress analysis to determine the calculated limit stress value, which was factored into
margins of safety calculations for ultimate strength and yield strength. |
The BPS is currently in Phase III, the final stage of development and verification for
spaceflight. In the summer of 2000, the unit will be subjected to a 24-day science test
followed by a long duration mission verification test that will simulate the actual
mission operations. This process will prove the hardware integrity and performance of the
BPS.
The BPS is currently manifested for ISS Utilization Flight (UF-1), scheduled in the
spring of 2001. Scientists will use Super Dwarf Wheat and a mustard-like plant for their
experiments. Both types of vegetation feature short lifecycles, which is ideal for the
limited duration spaceflight missions.
In the future, ORBITEC plans to design a larger, next generation Plant Research Unit
for use on long duration ISS missions, according to Iverson. Since the requirements for
the Plant Research Unit and ISS will be much more demanding compared to the BPS, Iverson
expects he will employ ALGORs fluid flow and heat transfer analysis software when
ORBITEC designs this unit in addition to conducting linear static and dynamic stress
analyses. |
|